Treasury blocked NHS bed requests, Covid inquiry told
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53421/5342199dd14e0e61d08140988c05f427b1e726d9" alt="Headshot of Amanda Pritchard giving evidence of Covid test"
Boris Johnsonâs government has blocked a request for funding for another 10,000 hospital beds at the height of the Covid pandemic, the chief executive of NHS England has said.
Amanda Pritchard told the UK COVID-19 inquiry that the decision taken by the Treasury in July 2020 was âvery disappointingâ.
He said the additional beds and staff would have been used to cut waiting lists for planned care and âbuild resilienceâ in a second winter wave of the pandemic.
The government has said it cannot comment until the investigation is ongoing.
Health ministers at the time are expected to give evidence at the third section of the inquiry later this month looking at the impact of Covid on the NHS and health care systems across the UK.
Ms Pritchard served as chief operating officer of NHS England from 2019 until she was promoted to chief executive in August 2021.
In his evidence, he said a request was made to the government in July 2020 for 10,000 additional permanent, staffed hospital beds.
âVery disappointingâ
The demand was based on modeling of the spread of the virus as well as the need to deal with other pressures heading into the coming winter and resuming more planned, or elective, surgeries and other treatments for non-Covid patients.
But the investigation revealed that the Treasury and the Prime Ministerâs private office had rejected the request, saying they wanted greater use of the private sector as well as temporary Nightingale hospitals.
And Ms Prichard was told the decision would be revisited as part of a wider spending review expected in autumn 2021.
He described the decision as âvery disappointingâ, saying that if additional funding had been agreed the waiting lists for planned NHS treatment in England would be in a âvery different situationâ today.
âIf we had that capacity, we could certainly treat thousands more patients ⊠as well as be more resilient through the second wave of the pandemic and into the winter,â Ms Prichard said.
In the summer of 2020, the NHS in England had a total permanent bed capacity to treat about 95,000 patients in acute hospitals.
This was to be increased by 4,000 from winter 2023, under a recovery plan agreed by then Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.
âAbsolutely awesomeâ
Later in her evidence, Ms Pritchard said the health service faced a period of âextreme pressureâ in the winter of 2020-21 as another wave of Covid spread across the country.
By that time, new treatments had been discovered, including the cheaper steroid dexamethasone, and the first Covid vaccines were beginning to be administered in small numbers.
But the level of community transmission at the time meant that some intensive care units were still being pushed âto the brinkâ and were âright on the edgeâ of running out of bed space.
Ms Pritchard said that nationally, the health service had never had to âsystematically limitâ access to treatment because hospitals could not cope with demand.
âHowever, that does not mean that staff in those locations did not feel completely overburdened at this time â and it does not mean that the kind of care that was being provided was anything like normal,â he said.
âField Hospitalâ
Ms Pritchard was also asked about the seven temporary Nightingale hospitals quickly built in March and April 2020 to treat Covid patients across England.
Data seen by the inquiry shows that the total cost to the taxpayer, including installation and decommissioning, is now estimated at ÂŁ358.5 million.
Hospitals in Birmingham, Bristol, Exeter, Harrogate, London, Manchester and Sunderland treated 141 Covid patients in the first wave of the virus and 1,097 Covid and other patients in the second wave.
In total, ÂŁ50.4 million was spent on one site in Birmingham, which was never used by patients in the pandemic.
The Bristol site also carried out 6,554 assessments for patients at the cityâs eye hospital.
Ms Pritchard told the inquiry the program was still âusefulâ, as the sites were envisaged at the time as âmilitary field hospitalsâ.
âWe thought we were doing this to avoid the situation in northern Italy,â he said, referring to scenes in Lombardy, where intensive care units were overwhelmed.