Family doctors in England have been depths deeply on the issue of assisted dyeing, BBC research on plan to legalize practice suggestions.

Conclusions give a unique insight on how strong many GPs of the proposed new law feel – and highlight how personal beliefs and experiences are shaping the views of doctors on the issue.

BBC News sent more than 5,000 GPS to a questionnaire, asking if they agree with changing the law to allow some sick people to get assistance for some sick people in England and Wales.

More than 1,000 GP replied, about 500 told us that they were against an assistant dying law and about 400 said they were in favor.

Some of the 500 GPs who told us that they were against the change of law, which are called the bill “frightening”, “highly dangerous”, and “cruel”. “We are doctors, not killers,” one said.

Of the 400s who said that they supported assisted dyeing, some described the bill as “long overdue” and “a basic human right”.

“We are keeping the human body alive in the most inhuman way,” one said. He asked: “How do we morally justify these bodies to force them to be present in Dikripitude?”

We cannot know that GPS, which responds to the BBC, is representative of all family doctors.

This comes when MPs argue the proposed changes in the controversial bill again this week, with a vote in Parliament, it is expected whether to pass or block it next month.

If aided dying becomes legal in England and Wales, it will be a historical change for society.

Current laws prevent medics from helping any patient from fulfilling the desire to die. Terminally sick adults (end of life) bill will allow any doctor to involve assisted, but GP is often a large part of practice in other countries. On Tuesday, a separate bill passed an initial vote to legalize assisted dyeing in Scotland.

The BBC research conducted in a few weeks in March and April, how the GPS in England feels about the proposed new law, is deeply intensive.

Another argument of those who said that they were against the dead dying should focus on improving life care rather than a health system.

One GP stated that the construction of an assistant dying law was “condemnable” when Dharamshalas were funded by large -scale donations instead of the state.

Separately, on Tuesday, the Royal College of Psychiatrists said that while the group remains “neutral” on the principle of “Assisted dyeing, it” simply cannot support this bill “.

In an interview with BBC Newsnight, the President of the College, Dr. Lead smith Patients cited the lack of requirements related to “unmatched needs”, and lack of psychiatrists to process requests.

“We are worried that there is no need to think of any person, which any person needs. A person can have a person. A person with a terminal disease … They can be in pain, they may be in pain, have difficulty with their residence, their finance, because they have not been able to work, they can feel alone, different,” Dr. Smith said.

Dr. Gordon McDonald, CEO of Care Not Killing stated that there was a “black hole” in the budget of Dharamshala and “we don’t need better care”.

More than 400 GP told us that he supported a law change, some people described people in “severe pain or crisis”, dying “traumatized” and “haunted”.

Those who said that they were on the side, more than nine in 10 respondents believed that it could allow patients a dignified death.

Some shared personal experiences: Let us tell us about seeing our parents begging to lose dignity or to die. One said that his sick wife prayed every evening that he did not wake up in the morning.

Those who received assistance often talked about the patient’s choice, arguing that it was not allowed people to decide how they wanted to die.

He wanted an alternative to a supportive death for himself or his loved ones, another common reason for supporting the law.

“Personally, I will get it a comfort and I annoy those who take this option away from me,” one told us.

If the aided dying becomes a law in England and Wales, it would apply to some particularly sick patients, who were expected to die within six months.

But more than a quarter of all GPs who replied that they told us that they would rarely, or never be convinced whether a patient was expected to die within that time.

“It is also unpredictable in severely weak,” one said.

No doctor will be obliged to work in assisted dyeing. Of the 1,000 GP respondents, more than 500 told us that they would be ready to discuss dying with a patient.

Around 300 would assess whether a patient was eligible and 161 said they would prepare a substance to a patient to end their lives.

Royal College of GPS President Professor Kamila Hothorn said that BBC research has shown that “had real concerns about the practical and legal implications of changes in law on assisted dyeing in GPS”.

“They should be accepted and addressed, so that any law is waterclotted,” he said.

Sarah Wuton, the chief executive of dignity in dyeing, said GPS and other medics would “consider correctly how they will navigate the proposed law”.

He said that evidence of assisted dying laws in Australia and America showed that it could be “safely and effectively, which reaches gains for life care and strong safety for both patients and doctors”.

Additional Reporting by Vicky Lodar, Elena Bailey, Natalie Wright and Hannah Carpel