A surgeon found that patients were released in “pain” after using an artificial mesh to treat prolapseed intestines, in which they misused medical notes.

Tony Dixon was suspended after surgery, causing damage to hundreds of patients in two hospitals in Bristol.

Now, a new hearing Dr. Will examine Dixon’s record. He is accused of dishonestly making a patient record when he was involved in his care, something that he “strongly denied”.

Medical practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) will begin on Monday. This would check the medical records for false information for seven patients, and was not built at the right time.

Dr. A Dixon spokesperson said: “(He) always tried to provide the highest standard of care to his patients.

“He incorrectly disputes any medical records and will provide his detailed evidence to the Tribunal about the serious allegations, initially through a detailed witness statement that he has provided to the General Medical Council.”

Dr. Dixon created an international reputation as a go-two expert for patients with prolapseed bowel.

He used a technique known as mesh rectopaxi to treat intestinal problems.

Through the process, Aries implants are placed in the body to treat pelvic organ prolaps that can occur after delivery.

Aries, which is usually made from synthetic polypropylene, aims to repair damaged or weak tissue.

At the point of his suspension in 2024, MTPS said that Dr. Dixon’s “malpractice was so serious that action is required to protect the members of the public”.

However, the tribunal admitted that a long period of suspension would be improperly punitive, especially in mind that period that Dr. Dixon was already a matter of fitness to practice proceedings.

As the founder of the Pelvic Floor Society, he attracted a lot of claims he had done in medical publications, which were about the success rate of Rectopaxi Aries Surgery, which he was a pioneer.

But now questions are being raised by MPT about the honesty of their follow -up data, which is to be written contemporary.

In 2017, a BBC Inside Out Investigation revealed that Dr. Dixon conducted unnecessary operations and questioned whether he had followed adequate therapy.

Two investigations at Southmade Hospital and Spire Bristol later found Mr. Dixon that hundreds of people suffered damage which were not necessary.

Both hospitals apologized to the victims after their suspension.

The MPTS had earlier found that he failed to receive the informed consent or test alternative treatment and did not examine adequately examined symptoms.

The BBC has discovered that Dr. All the Dixon papers in the Journal Disease of the Colon & Rectum, now there are ‘anxiety feeling’ in the relevant letters relevant in the colorectal disease.

They focus on concerns about the honesty of their claims on patients.

Professor Susan Galandieuk, the editor of the head of The Journal Disease of the Colon and Rectum, who has published two letters with Tony Dixon’s data, said: “Many people will read journal articles and work based on their conclusions, regarding the practice of surgeons.

“Many other surgeons who are writing articles will cite these articles and form their findings on them.

“Sometimes or often these letters are used when guidelines are prepared or referred to. So their findings can affect many different things.”

The BBC through Rectopaxi Aries victims and aid group. More than 40 pre -Aries patients of Dixon are contacted separately.

None of them recognizes the follow -up form that he claimed to have used in publications for up to five years of post operative follow up.

These include Debbie Cooper Jones, a dentist of glucuster.

He said: “He felt that there was a lot of research from the papers on his website.

“So I was a little surprised at the lack of my follow -up because he was quoting so many figures.

“Perhaps, it seems a bit strange that we were not under that close monitoring given the nature of the surgery we have and perhaps the novelty of them was that it was a ground-breaking work.”

It will take several weeks to decide on the new allegations of the tribunal.

This decision is important when it finally comes to decide whether Dr. Dixon will eventually be able to return to the medical register again.

Follow BBC Bristol Facebook, X And InstagramSend us the ideas of your story on email or through medium WhatsApp 0800 313 at 4630,