The government has expressed concern about the timeline to implement the aided dying, understands the BBC, before the measures were designed to delay when available.

Labor MP Kim Leadbatter, who brought the bill, said she was “disappointed”, when he should be implemented by 2029, it was being proposed to move.

Some MPs expressed concern that this was the same year when the next general election was about to be held.

Officers and civil servants have advised the leadbatter to amend, including the government suggesting changes.

A spokesperson of the leadbatter said: “Kim is expected and believes that the service can be distributed more quickly when the law is enacted at the end of this year.”

A part of the cause of postponing the deadline is what a completely new service will be, for this, time is allowed to install training and systems. The changes made in the bill since voting in favor of MPs, including a new commission and panel system, have joined it.

The new amendment of the leadbutter changes the maximum implementation period from two years to four years. However, if all the systems are ready before four years, the assisted dyeing will proceed before the deadline.

It is understood that there is disagreement between ministers about delay in implementation, with some confidence it is a mistake.

The government is officially neutral to the bill in which many ministers are supporting.

“I can’t show off that I am not disappointed at extending the period of starting,” the leadbatter told the committee MPs that it has been tasked to investigate.

But he said that this change made a “four -year backstop”, saying: “It does not say that it cannot be implemented before then.”

Both MPs support Assisted Dyeing and have expressed disappointment.

A Liberal Democrat MP Tom Gordon, a Liberal Democrat in favor of the bill, said that other countries have implemented similar laws in a very short time.

He said, “The current law is thwarting terminal sick people, forcing them to suffer unbearable, travels abroad to die or risks their families to face police investigation. This modification will be unnecessarily suffering,” he said.

“Implementation risks delayed it to pushed beyond the next election, where it could be completely abandoned.”

Jess Asato, a Labor MP, who is against the bill, said: “Creating an arbitrary timeline on such a complex issue was never a sensible way to enact a life or death law. It again reflects the final-mattone switch that the entire process is with a change in the last-mintenment enough for the main sections of the bill.”