Cancer screening has been remembered and ignored criminal punishment due to people’s biological sex and gender identity collected, an independent review was found.

The review led by Professor Alice Sulivan underlined the risks of biological sex and gender, talking about clinical care, sex-specific cancer screening and safety.

Prosele, a professor at Sociology at University College London, urged public bodies to be “default” to “default” to be “default” to urge to collect data on both penis and gender identity “by default.

The Health Department stated that the findings “will be considered with the gravity that is worthy of the gravity, as it improves gender identity services in the board”.

Prosele Sulivan stated that “an illusion between sex and transgender and gender diverse identities had evolved in recent years and” merged both these things into a variable “.

While people can legally change the penis, they cannot change biological sex. This means that a woman who infection to become a male may still require cervical smear and transgender women may need prostate checks.

Prof. Sulivan told BBC Radio 4’s Today program that there is no reason for “trade off” between data recording data on sex and gender.

“The argument I have given in this report is that sex is really important, we should record it by default – transgender and gender diverse identity can also be recorded where it is appropriate,” he said.

“There is no reason to see it as a trade-band between the two. They are two different variables.”

Report, In February last year, the previous orthodox government also caused concern about commission, policing as the suspects do not have to tell the authorities that they have changed their name or gender.

It is possible that someone can be released from custody, before their derogatory history is known, it is said in the review.

The report recommends that the police force record data on sex in its system and the police prevents allowing changes in individual sex markers on the national computer.

It also said that the new NHS number and converted gender markers should no longer be released.

He urged the government to implement the recommendations “across the board”.

“I recommended that data on sex should be collected in all research and data collections by government and semi-government organizations, and I think it would be a big difference from implementing it,” he said.

“I think we need leadership, because people are confused and they are worried.”

A government spokesperson said: “This government is clear that the collection of accurate and relevant data is important in research and effective public services, especially when it comes to sex.”

The spokesman said the review has been shared with the office for national statistics and other departments.

A spokesman for the Prime Minister’s Kir Stmper said that the civil servants were taking action to ensure that there was correct guidance.

He said, “There are situations to clearly identify people’s gender, but the importance of biological sex, when it comes, for example, healthcare, general knowledge,” he said.