Opposition to a bill which will legalize the death aided in England and Wales, is growing between MPs, BBC has found.

The Assisted Dyeing Bill was supported by 330 MPs last year, in which its first major vote in the House of Commons was with a majority of 55 MPs from a wide range of political parties.

But at least at least a dozen MPs who supported it or ended in November, have now said that they are likely to vote against it.

The bill will allow sick adults to stay to die for less than six months.

Supporters are confident that it will eventually become a law but it further faces parliamentary tests.

The bill is a private member bill, sponsored by backbench labor MP Kim Leadbatter.

MPs have been given a free vote on this, which means that they can decide on their discretion instead of following the party line.

He has spent the last few months to check it in detail, which has more than 500 amendments.

Some of these changes will be voted by MPs next Friday – and in summer there will be a final Commons vote, before this will be for further investigation of the House of Lords.

Labor MP Marcus Campbell-Savers for Penrith and Solway is one of those who said that they are now likely to vote against the bill after supporting them first.

He said that he still considers himself a “supporter of assisted dyeing”, but believes that the current bill “crosses the red lines to protect the weak”.

“I want to look at safety measures, which will ensure that the aided dying is not more to include in situations where there are alternative ways to improve their quality of life,” said Campbell-Savers.

“I will also be very worried if the law produces a situation where people who considered themselves to be a burden on their families and friends, felt pressure to end their lives.”

Fellow Labor MP Josh Fenton-Gylin has also planned to vote, which has already avoided.

“If you ask me at any point in my life, I would always have said in favor of what I thought about the aid dying,” he told the BBC.

He suggested several amendments in the bill, and claimed that he is “still open to support the plans”, but suspects that it will change after blocking previous equal efforts.

He said, “We look at a lot of amendments, which are particularly aimed at stopping the forced to be protested by supporters of the bill,” he said, “I don’t think the bill is likely to be secured.”

Both MPs have added their names to the growing list of their colleagues, who have suggested that they will switch to the sides: Former Tory ministers George Freeman, Tory MPs Mike Wood and Andrew Snowden, Lib Dame Bryan Matthew, Labor’s Jonathan Obstruction, Reformation UK chief whip Lee Anderson and X-Remorm MP Lawve.

Labor MP Debbie Abraham and Tory MP Charlie Devirest, who already avoided, will vote.

Labor’s Carl Turner, who voted in the second reading, is now avoiding.

Tory MP David Davis has not announced how he plans to cast his next vote, but publicly supported several amendments that will take extensive changes in the bill.

Some MPs have also changed their stand by supporting the bill. Minister Chris Bryant is understood to be avoiding in November. Labor MP Jack Abbott, who voted against last November, is still likely to vote in favor.

Others who were hesitant are now more strongly in favor.

Liz Savella Roberts, leader of Plaid Simaru at Westminster, said she was initially concerned, but supported the principle of assisted dyeing.

“I think security measures are strengthened,” he said. “They have been improved through the Bill Committee and through the evidence we have heard.”

One of the changes made in the form of investigation of the bill was allowed to vote for Center members whether it would be applicable in Wales.

Despite the protest, supporters hope to clean the bill and go to the House of Lords.

Previsions supporting the bill do not expect many MPs to reverse their views – but with such tight margin, efforts to sideline support are in full swing.

A major threat to the supporters of the bill is deciding to return home to their constituencies instead of voting.

Due to a strangeness of the parliamentary system, the bills of private members are usually debated on Friday – one day when MPs are usually in their constituencies.

There is also increasing concern that the government cannot take the risk of giving it parliamentary time.

A labor source in protest against the bill told the BBC: “From winter fuel payments and personal freedom payments to defense and special educational requirements and disability expenses, a tight vote becomes a real problem when assisted dying on the government’s face.

“Many MPs feel that no one will be unaware of spending 10 political capital, which continues with this very divisive issue rather than choosing the goods we choose.”

Sign up for our political essential newspapers to maintain Westminster and beyond internal functioning.