Assisted dyeing cases will no longer be signed by the High Court under changes suggested by supporters of the bill.

The proposed law currently states that a judge of a High Court should investigate every person and has not been forced to decide to die.

But BBC News has been asked to Labor MP Kim Leadbuter behind the bill, suggesting that they change it with a panel of experts that will look after applications.

This comes after raising concerns over the ability of the court to listen to each individual case.

The leadbatter said the change would “make the system even stronger”.

However, some opponents of the bill are likely to criticize the move to water its safety measures.

If approved, the bill, which is currently believed by MPs, will allow terminal sick adults in England and Wales to be expected to die within six months so that they end their lives Can

Under the proposal of the leadbatter, the panel reviewing each application will be chaired by a senior legal person, but not necessarily a judge, and it will also include experts such as psychiatrists and social workers. If necessary, their decision may review the High Court.

Panels will be selected by a voluntary aided dying commission led by the High Court Judge or Senior Judge.

The Commission will oversee all matters for an assistant death and report on the number of applications every year and how many were approved and rejected.

Ministers and officials have been closely consulted on change, although the government technically remains neutral on the bill. Civil servants are drafting the amendment, which will be published next week.

The leadbutter argued that it was removing the judicial inquiry, but was turning it into a “Judge Plus” model.

However, he played the role of the High Court as part of the first “scrutiny of three layers”, which made it “the strongest, strongest law on the issue in the world”.

Voting will be done on the proposal A committee of MPs investigated the billMembers were chosen by the leadbatter and support the majority law.

The committee on Tuesday started the process of going through the bill line through the line.

He heard three days of oral evidence from experts two weeks ago, some of which expressed concern about the proposed role of the High Court in signing applications.

Retired High Court Judge Sir Nicolas Mostin told the panel that he felt that it would be “impossible” to rule in every aided dying case for the High Court.

“You are talking about about three quarters of the entire family division (court), but it is not doing anything,” he said.

He said that it should be “done by a panel set up … for each case, a doctor and a lawyer, they will have to agree, and they investigate that everything is legally done”.

The leadbutter said that he agreed to the need to involve other professionals.

He said, “This bill already has the strongest security measures anywhere in the world, but I have promised to focus on the advice that we have received how the bill can be strengthened, and this is what I have Has done, “He said.

“Many of them recommended the committee to either individually or in writing, recommended an increased role for professionals such as psychiatrists and social workers.

“I agree that it is their expertise in assessing that a person is able to make voluntary decision -free decisions, in addition to the necessary legal investigation, will make the system even stronger.”

More than 300 expected 300 amendments have been made in the coming weeks.

Liberal Democrat MP Tom Gordon, among those who argue on Tuesday, is being collided with a collision to people with a neurodynative disease, such as Parkinson’s, to use an auxiliary death to live with 12 months. Currently the bill helps people with terminal disease to die with six months or less.

Gordon told BBC News, “This bill is about to ensure that people facing painful deaths from terminal conditions can be chosen how they die.

“For people with neurodygenetic conditions, in their last six months, it may be too late to engage in the process of applying for them.”

It is understood that the leadbatter does not support expanding the scope of the bill, including 12 months to live.

The MPs supported proposals to get assistance in England and Wales in November, by a majority of 55.

However, this will be further debated by the House of Commons and Lords later in the year, and the final version requires the approval of both before the law is enacted.

Sign up for our politics required newspapers To read top political analysis, get insight from the entire UK and stay for speed with large moments. It will be distributed directly to your inbox every week.