A sperm donor who claims that more than 180 children have been given birth have been used by a judge to warn the dangers of irregular sperm donations.

Robert Charles Albon, who calls himself a donor, claims that children have been claimed to make children a father worldwide from China to Australia after online advertisements.

But using her as a donor turned into a “scary story” for a couple, as he took them to court because he wanted the rights of parents over his child.

The BBC has approached Mr. Albon for the response.

It is extremely rare for parents in a family court case about children to be identified publicly for children, but the family court judge said it was in public interest in the naming of Mr. Albon.

In his judgment, Jonathan Furnace Casey said he wanted to prevent women from the possible sperm donor’s possible consequences and using Sri Albon.

In this case the child was conceived by syringe injection for the same-Sex couple, although Mr. Albon claimed that there was secret sex with a biological mother behind a car. It is a claim that it was rejected by the judge.

The Cardiff Family Court heard that Mr. Albon, who is in his 50s, was a “stranger” for the child and met him for only 10 minutes when a few weeks of age for “One-off” photo.

Mr. Albon applied to the court for the responsibility of parents, which was named on the birth certificate and the child’s name was changed.

Mr. Albon wanted the child’s non-living mother to be called “aunt” instead of mother, despite the fact that she had worked as a parent from birth.

Both mothers said that legal proceedings stressed – which took more than two years – was quoted as a factor of their relationship breakdown.

The court has heard that the biological mother is worse in the case due to anxiety, depression and suicidal ideas.

Decision – was made in 2023, but only published – Mr. Elbon said he claims that he wanted to “protect the child’s welfare” when he was actually “completely self -centered”.

Judge Furnace concluded: “He chose a sperm donor, who advertised that he would leave it to the mother whether there should be any contact.

“The evidence from his own social media content was that Albon indicated that the situation is.”

The court found that Mr. Albon, who is originally from the United States, but living in North-East England, initiated family proceedings to support his immigration status to live in the UK. He is something that he denies.

“In fact he is a person who wants to control,” said Judge Furnace.

“Women and children appear to be almost an object to them because they determine to increase their number of children from all over the world – China, United States, Argentina, Australia and Britain to name some countries where he Has given birth to children. “

In this case, the judge found that “there is no positive welfare benefit in changing the child’s name” and the direct contact between him and the child would not be in the best interest of the child.

Neither mother opposed the “letterbox contact”, so Mr. Albon can send an annual card or email, when the child is of an age to understand who it is.

Mr. Albon advertises on social media accounts such as Facebook and Instagram and donates through various methods, including more natural methods such as artificial insemination and sexual intercourse.

In an interview with The Sun last August, he said: “I have about 180 living births and I have met around 60 of them.”

“I can’t see much of them, it is to do it with the relationship of the child’s mothers … this is my priority for some kind of relationship.”

Non-jawic mother said that Mr. Albon’s insistence on the rights of parents was a “nightmare and a scary story”.

“She believes that the world needs to learn about the risks associated with irregular sperm donations,” said Judge Furnace.

“To get pregnant, public and weak women should know that this is the case and they risk a uniform ‘scary story’.”

The judge stated that he wanted to “protect women from the possible sperm donor’s possible consequences, generally, but also from the donor”.

He said, “He is a person who intends to continue donating sperm and weak women who are interested in such services, they should fully understand the risks of joining them.”

The way he was giving sperm was irregular because it was not through a licensed clinic, which had no limit to protection from legal rights as compulsory health check -ups, compulsory health check -ups, or parents.

Britain’s rules say Sperm from single donor used through licensed clinics Only a maximum of 10 families can be used to create.

Mr. Albon has talked about his motive to donate first. He claimed that he wanted to help create life when it was derogatory when people said that they did not only do for sex, made no money and were often lucky to break on travel expenses.

Family Court proceedings are private, although under a recent change in court rules in England and Wales, journalists can participate in some information and report.

Measures have been taken to ensure that the child cannot be identified.

In this case, unusually, the parent acting on behalf of the child made an application Decisions should be published online And the father should be named.

It was argued that it is important that the public should know about the dangers of informal sperm donations. Both mothers agreed to publication.

Human Fourism and Embryology Authority (HFEA) stated that it was “always safe to treat with donor sperm” licensed in clinics, “where there are laws and guidance to protect and support patients and donors” .

HFEA’s Claire Atting Hoshan said licensed clinics also expected to follow the “10 family limit”, restricting the number of families that can be built with a donor.

If you are influenced by any issue raised in this story, it is available through support and advice BBC Action Line,